This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice.
In what might be one of the most unusual DUI cases of the year, Canadian man Kasper Lincoln was arrested earlier this month in Prince George, British Columbia, for driving a child's pink Barbie Jeep while intoxicated during morning rush hour traffic. The incident, which has unsurprisingly gone viral on social media, highlights important legal principles that apply equally to American drivers and might leave many unprotected in similar situations.
On September 5, 2025, Lincoln borrowed his roommate's daughter's motorized Barbie Jeep—a toy designed for children ages 3-7—to make a Slurpee run because he "got lazy" and didn't want to walk. Despite traveling at approximately 3-5 mph and using hand signals, Lincoln attracted police attention by operating the bright pink toy vehicle on a busy road during morning traffic.
During the traffic stop, officers discovered Lincoln had a suspended driver's license and determined he was intoxicated through breathalyzer tests. He was arrested for prohibited driving and impaired operation, receiving a 90-day driving ban and a court date scheduled for December.
The Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) explained their reasoning in a Facebook post: "Any vehicle on a roadway that is powered by anything other than muscular power fits into the definition of a motor vehicle and requires a licensed driver and insurance." This definition mirrors similar legal language used throughout the United States.
Kyra Lee, a lawyer not involved with the case, told CBC: "You are required to have a driver's license in British Columbia if you're operating any motorized vehicle on the roadway. That includes Barbie cars, toy cars, electric skateboards—anything like that. It is required to have a licence and insurance."
While this case occurred in Canada, American drivers should recognize that similar laws exist throughout the United States. Most states define "motor vehicles" broadly to include any self-propelled vehicle not operated exclusively on rails. This definition can potentially encompass:
The key determining factor is typically whether the device is being operated on a public roadway rather than on private property. This distinction explains why children can legally operate toy cars in their driveways but adults cannot drive them on public streets.
This bizarre case highlights a significant insurance gap that could affect many Americans. Most auto insurance policies provide coverage for "named insureds" operating "insured vehicles," but toy vehicles like the Barbie Jeep would not typically qualify as insured vehicles under standard policies.
This creates a concerning scenario where someone could:
While the image of an adult driving a Barbie Jeep while wearing aviator sunglasses might seem humorous, this case illustrates several serious legal principles:
Most states prohibit operating "motor vehicles" while intoxicated, with courts interpreting this term expansively. Previous cases have resulted in DUI convictions for operators of riding lawnmowers, golf carts, and even motorized barstools on public roads.
A suspended license could prohibit operating any motorized vehicle on public roadways, not just conventional cars and trucks. Violations can result in extended license suspensions and even jail time.
Many Americans assume their auto insurance would cover unusual vehicles or situations, but most policies have significant exclusions. Those causing accidents while operating unconventional vehicles might face personal financial ruin.
To avoid similar legal troubles and ensure proper protection:
As Lincoln himself acknowledged after his arrest: "Don't drink and drive." This advice applies regardless of what vehicle you're operating, whether a full-sized truck or a child's toy car. The legal and financial consequences can be surprisingly severe even in seemingly humorous situations.
For more information on how to protect yourself from unusual insurance gaps or understand your state's specific laws, visit our educational resources and our news page at YourAccident.com.
Advertising is paid for by participating attorneys in a joint advertising program, licensed to practice law in their respective states. A complete list of joint advertising attorneys can be found here. You can request an attorney by name. We are not a law firm or an attorney referral service. This advertisement is not legal advice and is not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of your legal matter. Every case is different. The outcome depends on the laws, facts, and circumstances unique to each case. Hiring an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertising. Request free information about your attorney's background and experience. This advertising does not imply a higher quality of legal services than that provided by other attorneys. This advertising does not imply that the attorneys are certified specialists or experts in any area of law. No legal services will be provided unless a signed agreement between the client and the attorney exists. We use cookies to personalize content and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our analytics partners, who may combine it with other information you've provided or collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.