
| Insurance System | At-fault |
|---|---|
| Comparative Fault Standard | Modified comparative fault — 51% bar |
| Personal Injury Statute of Limitations | 2 years from date of injury discovery |
| Property Damage Statute of Limitations | 2 years from date of accident |
| Wrongful Death Statute of Limitations | 2 years from date of death |
| Government Entity Notice Deadline | 90 days from date of incident |
| Minimum Bodily Injury Coverage | $25,000 per person / $50,000 per accident |
| Minimum Property Damage Coverage | $25,000 per accident |
| UM/UIM Required | Yes — mandatory at limits matching liability coverage* |
| Punitive Damages Cap | Yes — generally limited to attorney fees and litigation costs |
*Connecticut requires UM/UIM coverage as a mandatory element of every auto policy, not simply an option insurers must offer. UM/UIM minimum limits must match the driver's liability limits at 25/50. Connecticut's minimum liability coverage (25/50/25) is unchanged and not scheduled to change in 2026. A plaintiff found exactly 50 percent at fault may still recover damages, reduced by half. A plaintiff found 51 percent or more at fault recovers nothing under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-572h.
Connecticut operates under an at-fault insurance system, meaning the driver responsible for a crash is financially liable for resulting damages. Injured parties pursue compensation from the at-fault driver's insurer, file a lawsuit directly against the at-fault driver, or both.
All drivers operating a vehicle in Connecticut must carry the following minimum coverage under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-112:
These minimums are commonly expressed as 25/50/25 with matching 25/50 UM/UIM. At these levels, coverage can be exhausted quickly in serious crashes. Higher voluntary limits are advisable for most drivers.
Note that Connecticut is one of a small number of states where UM/UIM coverage is not simply offered and declined; it is required by law under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 38a-336. Every Connecticut auto policy must include at least $25,000 per person and $50,000 per accident in combined uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage.
MedPay is available as an optional add-on covering medical expenses for you and your passengers regardless of fault, up to the policy limit. It pays without waiting for a fault determination and can cover deductibles and co-pays that health insurance does not address.
For drivers working for Uber, Lyft, or similar platforms, Connecticut law establishes coverage requirements based on driver status:
Which policy applies depends on the driver's status at the time of the crash.
Driving without required insurance in Connecticut carries consequences under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-213b:
An uninsured driver who causes a crash may face personal financial liability for all resulting damages, including medical expenses, lost wages, and property damage.
Connecticut follows a modified comparative fault rule under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-572h. An injured party can recover damages only if their share of fault does not exceed 50 percent. A plaintiff found 50 percent at fault or below can recover, with their damages reduced proportionally by their fault share. A plaintiff found 51 percent or more at fault recovers nothing.
A concrete example: if you are found 30 percent at fault and your total damages are $100,000, you recover $70,000. If you are found 50 percent at fault, you recover $50,000. If you are found 51 percent at fault, you recover nothing.
This is commonly described as Connecticut's 51% bar rule, the threshold at which recovery is eliminated. It positions Connecticut alongside most states using modified comparative fault. For a broader explanation of how these fault systems compare, see our article on comparative and contributory negligence.
Fault is established through police reports, witness statements, dashcam and surveillance footage, traffic camera footage, physical evidence, vehicle damage patterns, road conditions, medical records, and accident reconstruction analysis in contested cases. Insurance adjusters begin their own fault investigation promptly after any significant crash.
Statements made at the scene or to an insurance adjuster can affect how fault is assigned. Under Connecticut's 51% bar, even a small shift in the fault percentage can mean the difference between reduced compensation and no compensation at all, making early legal involvement and careful handling of recorded statements to insurers particularly important.
When more than two parties share responsibility for a crash, fault is allocated among all involved based on each party's contribution. A driver who causes the initial collision may still bear responsibility for foreseeable secondary impacts. In motorcycle crashes involving multiple vehicles, this principle is particularly significant: a driver who strikes a motorcycle and causes the rider to impact a second vehicle may bear liability for the full sequence of injuries depending on how foreseeability and causation are established under Connecticut law. These cases typically require careful reconstruction of the sequence, timing, vehicle positions, impact points, and available video or dashcam footage.
Connecticut's 51% bar applies equally to vulnerable road users. A pedestrian who crosses outside a marked crosswalk, a cyclist without required lighting, or a motorcyclist accused of speeding may still recover damages if a driver also contributed to the crash, as long as their share of fault does not exceed 50 percent. The fault allocation question in these cases turns on the same evidence standards as any other crash.
Most states require insurers to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage, but leave the decision to carry it in the driver's hands. Connecticut does not. Every Connecticut auto liability policy must include UM/UIM coverage at limits matching the driver's liability coverage. Drivers cannot waive this protection, and insurers cannot omit it.
The mandatory nature of Connecticut's UM/UIM requirement means that every insured driver in the state has a backstop available when the at-fault driver is uninsured or underinsured. In states where UM/UIM is purely optional, a driver who declined coverage after a crash involving an uninsured at-fault driver has no first-party insurer to turn to beyond their own health insurance and whatever assets the at-fault driver personally holds. In Connecticut, that gap is closed by statute.
This is particularly significant given Connecticut's traffic density. The I-95 corridor carries some of the highest commercial and passenger vehicle volumes in New England, and the mix of Connecticut-registered vehicles, out-of-state drivers, and commercial carriers means the risk of encountering an underinsured or uninsured driver is not theoretical. When that driver causes a serious crash, the injured party's own UM/UIM policy becomes the primary financial resource beyond the at-fault driver's inadequate limits.
When the at-fault driver is uninsured, a Connecticut driver pursues their UM claim against their own insurer, which steps into the position the at-fault driver's insurer would have occupied. When the at-fault driver is underinsured, the Connecticut driver pursues both the at-fault driver's policy to its limit and then their own UIM policy for the remaining damages up to their UIM limit.
Standard UIM recovery in Connecticut is subject to an offset: the UIM payment is typically reduced by what the at-fault driver's insurer already paid. A driver with $50,000 in UIM coverage who received $25,000 from the at-fault driver's insurer would normally recover up to $25,000 more under standard UIM, not an additional $50,000.
Connecticut's conversion coverage option under § 38a-336(f) eliminates that offset. A driver who purchases conversion coverage can access their full UIM policy limit regardless of what the at-fault driver's insurer paid. Using the same example, a driver with $50,000 in conversion UIM coverage who received $25,000 from the at-fault driver could recover up to an additional $50,000 from their own insurer rather than the reduced $25,000 available under standard UIM.
The difference between standard UIM and conversion coverage can be substantial in serious crashes where the at-fault driver carries the minimum $25,000 per person in liability coverage, and the injured party's damages are significantly higher. Conversion coverage is available at the time of policy purchase and is worth understanding before a crash occurs rather than after.
The statute of limitations sets the deadline for filing a lawsuit after a car accident. Missing the applicable deadline almost always bars the claim permanently.
Connecticut's personal injury and property damage limitations period contains a critical outer boundary: even when the discovery rule applies, no action may be brought more than three years from the date of the act or omission complained of. This means a plaintiff who discovers an injury late cannot file a lawsuit more than three years after the negligent act that caused it, regardless of when the injury was found. The two-year period runs from discovery; the three-year statute of repose is the absolute ceiling.
The wrongful death period runs from the date of death, which may differ from the date of the accident if the injured person survived before dying from their injuries.
When a crash involves a government-owned vehicle, a government employee acting in their official capacity, or a defect on a government-maintained road, bridge, or sidewalk, Connecticut imposes a short notice requirement that operates as a condition precedent to filing a lawsuit.
Under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 13a-149, written notice must be given to the relevant municipality within 90 days of the injury. The notice must describe the injury, its cause, and the time and place of occurrence. The underlying lawsuit must still be filed within two years of the injury, but the 90-day notice is the earlier and more dangerous deadline: missing it gives the municipality grounds to seek dismissal of the claim regardless of its merits. A defective or incomplete notice carries the same risk as no notice at all.
Connecticut law requires drivers involved in a crash to immediately notify the nearest police authority when the crash resulted in injury or death to any person, or when it caused property damage. All drivers involved must remain at the scene until law enforcement arrives and must provide their name, address, vehicle registration number, and insurance information to responding officers and other involved parties.
When law enforcement responds, the attending officer files a Connecticut Uniform Police Crash Report. This report becomes the primary document for insurance claims and legal proceedings.
Connecticut does not operate a centralized civilian online self-report portal the way some other states do. When a crash occurs, and no law enforcement officer responds to the scene, drivers should take the following steps:
If a report was not filed by law enforcement and you need documentation for an insurance claim, contact the Connecticut State Police or the investigating local department directly to inquire whether a report can still be initiated.
Connecticut law includes a specific reporting obligation for crashes involving dogs. Under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-226, a driver who injures or kills a dog must stop, make reasonable efforts to notify the owner, and report the incident to local police. Failure to stop and report is a fineable infraction. This is a genuine Connecticut-specific obligation that does not exist in most other states in this series.
Crash reports filed by Connecticut State Police can be requested through several channels:
For crashes investigated by a local police department or town constabulary, contact the relevant agency directly for report access procedures and applicable fees.
Crash reports are primary reference documents for insurers and attorneys in claims and litigation. Errors are worth addressing promptly. See our article on what to do if your car accident police report is inaccurate for the steps involved.
Connecticut does not cap compensatory damages in personal injury or wrongful death cases. There is no statutory ceiling on economic or non-economic damages recoverable from a private defendant in a vehicle accident lawsuit, meaning the size of a compensatory award is determined by the evidence of harm rather than a legislative limit.
Economic damages cover measurable financial losses and are uncapped in Connecticut vehicle accident cases. They include:
Non-economic damages address losses that cannot be reduced to a bill or receipt, including pain and suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, and loss of consortium. Connecticut imposes no cap on non-economic damages in personal injury cases arising from vehicle accidents.
A spouse or domestic partner of a seriously injured person may bring a separate loss of consortium claim for the loss of companionship and support.
When a crash results in death, surviving family members or the estate may pursue a wrongful death claim. Connecticut's wrongful death statute is compensatory in nature, meaning damages are measured by the losses suffered rather than the defendant's conduct. Recoverable damages include the economic value of the deceased's lost earning capacity, destruction of the ability to carry on life's activities, and the pain and suffering experienced before death. Connecticut does not limit wrongful death damages by statute.
Under § 52-555, a wrongful death action may be brought by the executor or administrator of the deceased's estate. The damages recovered are distributed to the surviving spouse and heirs rather than remaining part of the general estate.
Connecticut's approach to punitive damages is more restrictive than most states in this series, and the applicable rule depends on the type of claim.
For standard negligence claims, including most vehicle accident cases, Connecticut common law limits punitive damages to litigation expenses, including attorney fees above the taxable costs of the action. This is not a multiplier of compensatory damages; it means the defendant pays a portion of the plaintiff's legal costs as the punitive element, rather than a separate substantial penalty. Connecticut courts have described this limitation as reflecting the state's historic approach to punitive damages as a deterrent rather than a windfall.
When a crash involves a defective vehicle or vehicle component, a product liability claim may also be available under Connecticut's Product Liability Act. Under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 52-240b, punitive damages in product liability actions are capped at twice the compensatory damages awarded to the plaintiff, provided the claimant proves the harm resulted from the product seller's reckless disregard for safety. This is a meaningfully higher ceiling than the common law attorney fees rule and can be significant when a vehicle defect contributed to the crash. See our article on product liability in car accident cases for how these claims work alongside standard negligence claims.
Connecticut allows certain negligence claims against state agencies and municipalities, but sovereign immunity principles limit recovery in specific circumstances. The discretionary-function doctrine protects government decisions involving planning, policy, or judgment. Road design choices, maintenance prioritization, and emergency response decisions may fall within protected categories.
Connecticut's at-fault system means there is no automatic first-party coverage for medical expenses after a crash. Costs are addressed through the at-fault driver's liability insurance, your own optional coverages, and health insurance, with sequencing depending on which coverages you carry.
The at-fault driver's bodily injury liability policy is the primary source of coverage for your medical expenses. At Connecticut's minimum of $25,000 per person, that coverage can be exhausted quickly in serious crashes. When it is, your own coverages become the next resource.
Connecticut does not require PIP since it is an at-fault state. MedPay is available as an optional first-party coverage that pays for medical expenses for you and your passengers regardless of fault, up to the policy limit. It pays without waiting for a fault determination, making it a practical resource for covering immediate costs while a liability claim is pending. MedPay can also cover deductibles and co-pays that health insurance does not address.
Once MedPay limits are exhausted or if you do not carry MedPay, your health insurance covers ongoing accident-related treatment. Most health insurers will cover accident-related care, but may assert a subrogation lien on any settlement or judgment you receive from the at-fault driver. Self-funded employer plans governed by ERISA can assert subrogation rights that Connecticut state rules cannot limit. Understanding your plan's subrogation terms before settling is important.
As discussed in the mandatory UM/UIM section above, Connecticut requires every auto policy to include UM/UIM coverage. When the at-fault driver has no insurance or insufficient coverage, your UM/UIM policy becomes the primary recovery source beyond a personal lawsuit. Connecticut's conversion coverage option, where available, allows access to the full UIM limit without offset from the at-fault driver's payment.
Connecticut experiences significant winter driving hazards across its highway network, with I-95 through Fairfield County and the Merritt Parkway presenting particular risk given their traffic density, limited shoulders, and mix of local, commuter, and long-haul vehicle traffic.
Under Connecticut's 51% modified comparative fault rule, a driver who fails to adapt speed and following distance to snow or ice-covered road conditions shares fault proportionally in any resulting crash. A driver found to have maintained highway speed on a visibly icy road, ignored posted weather advisories, or failed to use adequate traction equipment may bear a significant share of fault. When that share reaches 51% or more, the claim is eliminated entirely. Courts examine the conditions visible to each driver at the time, the posted speed, weather advisories in effect, and each driver's chosen speed and following distance relative to those conditions.
When poor road maintenance, inadequate salting, or failure to close a known hazardous route contributed to a crash, a government entity claim may be worth exploring, subject to the 90-day notice requirement under § 13a-149 discussed in the statute of limitations section above.
Connecticut sits between New York City and Boston on the most heavily traveled interstate corridor in the country. I-95 through Fairfield County carries some of the highest combined commercial and passenger vehicle volumes in New England, creating crash risk patterns unlike those in less densely trafficked states. Chain-reaction crashes, rear-end collisions during congestion, and commercial vehicle incidents are disproportionately common on this corridor.
Under Connecticut's modified comparative fault framework, multi-party fault allocation in chain-reaction crashes requires careful analysis of each driver's contribution — including speed, following distance, distraction, and reaction time — since the 51% bar makes the allocation outcome particularly consequential.
Connecticut's urban centers, including Hartford, New Haven, Bridgeport, and Stamford, have walkable downtown corridors with significant pedestrian and cyclist activity at intersections and crosswalks. Connecticut's 51% bar applies to vulnerable road users as it does to drivers. A pedestrian found more than 50% at fault for a crossing incident cannot recover even when a driver also contributed substantially. At 50% or below, recovery is available but proportionally reduced.
Connecticut law requires drivers to yield to pedestrians in marked and unmarked crosswalks under Conn. Gen. Stat. § 14-300, and failure to yield is a traffic violation that can support a negligence per se argument in the civil claim. At the same time, a pedestrian who crosses against a signal or outside a designated crossing may have their own fault share assessed, making the specific circumstances of each pedestrian crash legally significant.
Connecticut Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV)
Handles driver licensing, vehicle registration, financial responsibility filings, and insurance compliance verification.
Connecticut Department of Emergency Services and Public Protection (DESPP) / State Police
Responds to accidents on state highways, investigates crashes within State Police jurisdiction, and handles crash report requests for State Police-investigated incidents.
Connecticut Department of Transportation (CTDOT)
Maintains Connecticut's road infrastructure, publishes road condition and travel advisory information, and administers highway safety programs.
Connecticut Insurance Department (CID)
For insurance complaints, coverage disputes, insurer licensing verification, and questions about mandatory UM/UIM coverage, conversion coverage, and minimum liability requirements.
For accident laws in other states, visit our state-specific legal information page.

Advertising is paid for by participating attorneys in a joint advertising program, licensed to practice law in their respective states. A complete list of joint advertising attorneys can be found here. You can request an attorney by name. We are not a law firm or an attorney referral service. This advertisement is not legal advice and is not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of your legal matter. Every case is different. The outcome depends on the laws, facts, and circumstances unique to each case. Hiring an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertising. Request free information about your attorney's background and experience. This advertising does not imply a higher quality of legal services than that provided by other attorneys. This advertising does not imply that the attorneys are certified specialists or experts in any area of law. No legal services will be provided unless a signed agreement between the client and the attorney exists. We use cookies to personalize content and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our analytics partners, who may combine it with other information you've provided or collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.