
The federal courtroom in New Orleans was packed on the afternoon of March 20, 2026, as a jury delivered its verdict after more than five hours of deliberation. Vanessa Motta sobbed silently, hugging her teenage daughter. Her mother collapsed in the front row. Jason Giles sat stone-faced. Both disgraced attorneys were found guilty on eight counts each, including conspiracy to commit mail and wire fraud, multiple counts of mail fraud, and witness tampering. Their law firms were also convicted. Chief U.S. District Judge Wendy Vitter, who had watched the three-week trial unfold, immediately ordered both lawyers taken into custody. "To be clear," she said, "this is anything but a typical fraud case."
The convictions mark the culmination of a years-long federal investigation, dubbed "Operation Sideswipe," that has exposed a dark underbelly of the personal injury bar. But while Motta and Giles now await sentencing, the legal fallout is far from over. Hundreds of their former cases remain unresolved, and the broader question of accountability continues to ripple through the Louisiana legal system.
The jury convicted Motta and Giles on all major charges. They were found guilty of:
A third defendant, Diaminike Stalbert, was acquitted of conspiracy but convicted of making false statements to the FBI. She faces up to five years in prison and was released pending sentencing.
The verdict followed more than two weeks of testimony from cooperating witnesses, including "slammers" Damian Labeaud and Ryan Harris, and the only other lawyer charged in the scheme, Danny Patrick Keating Jr., who had already pleaded guilty. Prosecutors painted a picture of attorneys who knowingly paid street-level operatives to stage collisions with 18-wheelers, filled cars with passengers, and then filed fraudulent lawsuits to extract insurance payouts.
U.S. Attorney Michael Simpson, after the verdict, said Motta and Giles "abused their positions and violated their oaths as attorneys."
Both Motta and Giles remain in federal custody. Their sentencing hearings are scheduled for:
Each faces a maximum sentence of 20 years in federal prison for the most serious counts. However, the final sentencing range, likely between 7 and 12 years, will depend heavily on the amount of money the court determines they fraudulently obtained.
Judge Vitter's decision to jail them immediately was driven by the witness tampering convictions and, in Motta's case, a previous violation of her bond conditions. The judge also noted that Motta's fiancé, disbarred attorney Sean Alfortish, awaits trial for the murder of cooperating witness Cornelius Garrison III, who was gunned down in 2020 after agreeing to testify. Alfortish's trial is scheduled for August.
The convictions have created a cascade of unresolved legal questions. Hundreds of personal injury cases filed by Motta and Giles, some of which were allegedly tainted by fraud, remain pending. Testimony at trial revealed that at least two cases involving Giles were stayed by a federal judge before his law license was suspended in December 2024. One of those involved Motta. Another of Motta's cases was transferred to a new attorney and settled out of court.
Raspanti explained the procedural reality: "That means everything is suspended, and any time limits are also suspended, usually. But going forward, what they're going to have to do is ultimately get them dismissed. If they can tie the fraud to the case, then the defense attorneys would have to try to get them dismissed."
He emphasized that legitimate cases should proceed. "The cases that aren't tainted by fraud—no matter who the attorney was—should go forward. And they'll be judged on their merits."
The convictions of Motta and Giles are not the end of the story. The investigation remains active. Multiple attorneys who represented trucking and insurance companies testified during the trial that they had long suspected fraud in cases against Motta and Giles.
Notably, defense attorneys for Giles pointed out that two other lawyers who worked at The King Firm and received immunity were never called as witnesses. Giles's attorney, Lynda Van Davis-Greenstone, told reporters after the verdict, "I did find it interesting that lawyers who received immunity were not called as witnesses in this case. I found it very interesting that those who were convicted, entered guilty pleas of having staged the accidents did not come in and testify."
The implication is clear: the full scope of who knew what, and when, may not yet be fully public.
This case is a powerful reminder of several truths:
Motta and Giles will remain in federal custody until their sentencing in July. Sean Alfortish and Leon "Chunky" Parker await trial for the murder of Cornelius Garrison. And dozens of civil cases remain in legal limbo, awaiting review by judges and opposing counsel.
As Raspanti noted, the process will take time. But accountability, in criminal court at least, has arrived.
If you have been injured in a legitimate accident, you deserve an attorney who will fight for you with integrity and skill. The independent attorneys we connect you with are dedicated to helping real victims—no staged crashes required.

Advertising is paid for by participating attorneys in a joint advertising program, licensed to practice law in their respective states. A complete list of joint advertising attorneys can be found here. You can request an attorney by name. We are not a law firm or an attorney referral service. This advertisement is not legal advice and is not a guarantee or prediction of the outcome of your legal matter. Every case is different. The outcome depends on the laws, facts, and circumstances unique to each case. Hiring an attorney is an important decision that should not be based solely on advertising. Request free information about your attorney's background and experience. This advertising does not imply a higher quality of legal services than that provided by other attorneys. This advertising does not imply that the attorneys are certified specialists or experts in any area of law. No legal services will be provided unless a signed agreement between the client and the attorney exists. We use cookies to personalize content and to analyze our traffic. We also share information about your use of our site with our analytics partners, who may combine it with other information you've provided or collected from your use of their services. You consent to our cookies if you continue to use our website.